Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X79 (all builds)
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140725
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '17 at 17:20
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 94.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 215 81% 140 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 631 64% 517 Pts	64-Core 810 50% 810 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2992) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 384.76 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 68% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 142GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5647 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 720 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 56 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12172282299	105% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 408 Mixed 419 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 46.2 164% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 93.3 101% 171 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%
Crucial M500 240GB-$73 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13497 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2106 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 91 91 298 (AE) Unknown 100 100 103 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4066 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 59 176093659170 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 349 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 91 91 9 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 49152038676 (F7) Unknown 100 100 405853408 (F8) Unknown 100 100 3155331917	77.6% Very good	Read 498 Write 261 Mixed 346 81% 368 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 26.3 108% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 51.3 79% 151 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 91%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151 16,992 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 3TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 132 12058 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1903 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12671 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1896 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 66 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1836 (C2) HDA temperature 111 99 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	87.2% Excellent	Read 148 Write 156 Mixed 141 112% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.76 4K Mixed 0.23 110% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 100%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 170 166 6458 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3481 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17158 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2801 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 803 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 8 8 576949 (C2) HDA temperature 117 107 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 2	59.7% Above average	Read 107 Write 101 Mixed 100 77% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.12 66% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 65%
WD 15EARX External 1.5TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1TB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 27.8 Mixed 29.4 38% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.17 62% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 20%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB 660 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 345GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 112 Write 118 Mixed 70.3 126% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.28 47% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 20,667 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 34.2 105% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 13.6 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 58.1 69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	435x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	383x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	297x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	104x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	104x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	100x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	77x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	62x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	29x
Dominator DHX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 73%, 416 samples	21x
Vengeance DDR3 1866 4x8GBCorsairBench 88%, 441 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $812

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16