To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190708
Uptime11.3 Days
Run DateMay 14 '21 at 09:36
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 172
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 364
39% 313 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Intel(8086 2010) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.87 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0422C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 97 54 47 47 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 205
Write 207
Mixed 194
SusWrite 81.1
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 29.5
96% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 42.6
37% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 87%
MB3000GCWLU 3TB
356GB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 93 94 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 114
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 94
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 94%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.2 8.3 7.5 8.8 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.13% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 13.2
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 8.4
18% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.2
68% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 8G-PC3-10600U-1333 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.5% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback