Apple iMac18,3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemApple iMac18,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-BE088AF8C5EB4FA2
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '17 at 11:56
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 456
62% 461 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 570
Apple(106B 0163) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 51.2
Parallax 54.4
8% 38.5 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 41
Splatting 43.8
37% 46.1 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AQ04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 155
Write 134
Mixed 137
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.15
67% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 112%
WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B1 1TB
800GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 35.4
Mixed 18.5
37% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 0.17
30% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x344154463531323634485A2D3247334232202020 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 19.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,3 Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Apple iMac18,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback