Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150827
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '17 at 20:12
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 228
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 686
71% 569 Pts
64-Core 898
56% 898 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 21.3
17% 20.2 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 24
Splatting 18
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Areca RAID#1 24TB
2TB free
Firmware: R001 Max speed: n/a
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
574% Outstanding
Read 3,868
Write 4,574
Mixed 1,285
720% 3,243 MB/s
4K Read 130
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 134
443% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 36
DQ Write 45.9
DQ Mixed 17.1
20% 33 MB/s
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
753GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 490
Mixed 509
113% 504 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 40.8
152% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 36.9
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 22.8
62% 122 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
688GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 507
Write 457
Mixed 494
109% 486 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 24.8
106% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 33.9
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 17.8
57% 116 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 124%
Areca RAID#2 8TB
683GB free
Firmware: R001 Max speed: n/a
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
563% Outstanding
Read 3,863
Write 4,605
Mixed 689
676% 3,052 MB/s
4K Read 126
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 90.8
383% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 34
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 59.2
108% 198 MB/s
Poor: 263%
This bench: 563%
Great: 563%
Digintel HotSwap Bay1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 164
Mixed 149
119% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.24
111% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905598-009.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 39.9
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 20.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback