Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	65.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210615
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '21 at 18:30
Run Duration	324 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 87.2 1-Core 150 2-Core 295 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 555 8-Core 949 91% 752 Pts	64-Core 1,437 89% 1,437 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199 18,014 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Sapphire(174B E331) CLim: 1097 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.Q2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Lighting 88.4 Reflection 71.5 Parallax 118 72% 92.7 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 88.4 Splatting 44.1 52% 65.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,552 Write 1,734 Mixed 1,542 430% 1,943 MB/s	4K Read 65 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 89.4 298% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 1,315 DQ Write 1,175 DQ Mixed 1,215 919% 1,235 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 34GB free Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 205 204 205 204 207 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 494 Write 200 Mixed 191 SusWrite 203 60% 272 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 13.3 105% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 73.3 82% 138 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 78%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 20GB free Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 88 90 100 105 77 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 448 Write 174 Mixed 243 SusWrite 117 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 84.3 4K Mixed 15.5 98% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 23.4 43% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 36GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 115 126 113 115 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 114 Write 114 Mixed 91.4 SusWrite 113 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.6 264% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 126GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 144 135 142 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 108 Write 117 Mixed 126 SusWrite 140 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.7 335% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 89%
Seagate Desktop 8TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 6GB free Firmware: 040B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 118 Write 125 Mixed 88.5 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 263% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 93%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 16TB 195 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 8TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 35 33 35 11 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 60.9 Write 38.8 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 31.9 34% 45.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 112%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 51GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 56 57 58 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 54.5 Write 53.1 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 57.5 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1GB free Firmware: CC49 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 56.2 Write 56.7 Mixed 46.8 40% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 737 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 56GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 80 78 84 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 89.1 Write 81.1 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 80.2 105% 78.5 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 5.2 344% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 73,741 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	98.3% Outstanding	MC Read 40.1 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 39.3 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 26.8 SC Write 26.2 SC Mixed 36.5 85% 29.8 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	8	60	25.6"	1280 720	HWP26F9 HP LP2475w

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $144Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	872x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $195Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	834x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	515x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	403x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $67Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	340x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	272x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $904

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16