Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '21 at 02:54
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 692
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Gigabyte(1458 356C) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 0.8
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
As340 120GB 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 43 40 44 50 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47% Average
Read 484
Write 359
Mixed 379
SusWrite 53.8
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 15.1
83% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
333GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 122 120 122 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 146
Write 123
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 121
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59
101GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 75 73 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 65.5
Write 65.9
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 73.8
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32
17GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 26 29 39 38 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 7.9
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 33.3
16% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
47% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 41%
Asmedia ASMT1153e 80GB
46GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 28 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.6% Poor
Read 46.4
Write 28.3
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 28.6
25% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Sony Storage Media 8GB
1GB free, PID 05ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3.6 5.2 5.2 4 4.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.5
9% 9.57 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 9%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
20GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.4 8.6 8 8.3 8.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 19.4
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 8.3
26% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0
97% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AU008G-H2666G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 70 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback