Asus K52Je

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus K52Je (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K52Je
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '21 at 09:43
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65 10,722 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 79 2-Core 120 53% 87.4 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 170 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 14,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1BF2) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 3 Parallax 1.9 1% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32% Below average	Read 228 Write 59.3 Mixed 92.3 SusWrite 53.6 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 18.3 46% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 54.6 DQ Mixed 79.2 64% 92.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 85%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3.7 3.7 3.4 3.5 3.7 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	4.65% Terrible	Read 21.6 Write 3.7 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 3.7 10% 9.18 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.65% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SSZ3128M8-EDJED 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	SEC3046

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K52Je Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K52Je

CPU
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	20x
Pentium P6100IntelBench 35%, 6,283 samples	16x
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples	14x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	94x
Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)ATIBench 1%, 62 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x
128GB 127GBSSDBench 19%, 40 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
SSZ3128M8-EDJED 2x2GBAsintBench 24%, 452 samples	16x
HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 06C1 SSZ3128M8-EAEEF 4GBUnknownBench 22%, 6 samples	6x
SSZ3128M8-EAEEF 2x2GBAsintBench 24%, 277 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $205

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16