Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory53 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 21:17
Run Duration369 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 238
70% 132 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 912
83% 697 Pts
64-Core 1993
123% 1993 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 206
Parallax 194
163% 200 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 150
Splatting 133
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 141%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$123
480GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 251 103 423 353 362 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 79.5
Write 76.6
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 304
31% 135 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 8.4
18% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 133%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
14TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 217 259 238 261 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 103
Write 99.9
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 225
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 1.1
22% 6.83 MB/s
DQ Read 2.3
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 2.3
4% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 40%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
13TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 207 234 234 262 261 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 250
Write 240
Mixed 105
SusWrite 235
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 1.7
49% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 4.4
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 1.8
4% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 40%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
12.5TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 98 119 121 118 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 94.6
SusWrite 114
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 1.4
45% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 4.2
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 1.5
3% 5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24%
Great: 40%
ST16000NM003G-2KH113 16TB
6TB free
Firmware: SS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 174 180 200 209 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 162
Write 154
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 184
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 1.1
34% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 3.8
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 40%
Hitachi HDN 721010ALE604 10TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 248 243 247 238 245 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 241
Write 249
Mixed 121
SusWrite 244
156% 214 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.1
301% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%
Asmt ASM1352R-Volume 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 157 158 159 149 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 152
Write 98.4
Mixed 64
SusWrite 154
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%
BUFFALO HD-PATU3 1TB
931GB free, PID 021c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 112 111 111 111 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46% Average
Read 113
Write 78.8
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 109
118% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 46.3
MC Mixed 29.9
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 9.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 3R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 11% 44 270 190 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
History: Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 17: 3R 0G 2B
Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $885
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback