MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 08:29
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1,105
99% 837 Pts
64-Core 2,036
126% 2,036 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 153A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (165 fps cap detected)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 165
Parallax 165
134% 165 fps
MRender 165
Gravity 152
Splatting 136
122% 151 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 124%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,016
Write 1,200
Mixed 810
295% 1,342 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 83.3
287% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,202
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 953
745% 1032 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 243%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
212GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 50 50 50 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 23
Write 38.2
Mixed 29
SusWrite 49.4
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
129GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 63 63 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 89.5
Write 79.8
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 64.5
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HUS726060ALN610 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: APGNT7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 210 211 212 212 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 215
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 211
131% 179 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
194% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
124GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 70 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 73
Write 68.2
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 70.1
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 62%
SABRENT 1TB
271GB free
Firmware: RKT303.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1875 899 914 885 414 373 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
SDXC Card 125GB
5GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 13 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 41
Write 36
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 32.6
48% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 5.4
426% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 54.5
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 41
129% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 36.6
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 121%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,413
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback