Gigabyte GA-MD50-LS0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MD50-LS0 (all builds)
Memory	23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170417
Uptime	11 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '21 at 23:10
Run Duration	349 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 96 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 65.6 2-Core 127 57% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 474 44% 365 Pts	64-Core 2,282 141% 2,282 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 250GB 1,011 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 137 135 129 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 392 Write 266 Mixed 247 SusWrite 134 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 57.9 4K Mixed 21.9 77% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 214 176% 251 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 116%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 212GB free Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 143 114 104 93 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 348 Write 320 Mixed 285 SusWrite 128 61% 271 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 21.1 99% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 117 98% 143 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 88%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 905GB free Firmware: 032 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 145 144 139 140 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 426 Write 391 Mixed 370 SusWrite 142 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 21.1 89% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 239 191% 266 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 125%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB 2,601 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 289GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 84 83 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 70.3 Write 93 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 83.3 18% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 1.1 9% 4.47 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 12.4 DQ Mixed 1.2 3% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 38%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 94GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 79 77 77 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 83.8 Write 84.5 Mixed 66 SusWrite 77.2 58% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 610GB free Firmware: 0A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 120 122 121 122 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 138 Write 130 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 121 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 82 80 80 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 123 Write 119 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 80.3 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 100%
Amd-raid WDC WD6003FRYZ-0 6TB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 88 86 86 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 140 Write 147 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 86.5 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.9 371% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 140%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 510GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 143 143 142 141 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 152 Write 112 Mixed 81 SusWrite 141 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 113%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$270 1,221 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 524GB free Firmware: 2H02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 140 143 140 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 145 Write 158 Mixed 101 SusWrite 142 101% 137 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.9 448% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 138%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 129GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 122 124 124 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 100 Write 98.8 Mixed 67 SusWrite 124 72% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 424GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 118 121 122 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 122 Write 134 Mixed 71 SusWrite 121 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 113%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 130GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 26.5 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 10 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 63%
WD My Passport 2599 2TB 863 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 611GB free, PID 2599 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.8 9.8 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 26.3 Mixed 25 SusWrite 9.9 30% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 45%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 1TB 593 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 172GB free, PID 6298 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	7.86% Terrible	Read 32 Write 27.3 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 10.1 27% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.86% Great: 32%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB 615 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 168GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 26 Write 27.2 Mixed 24 SusWrite 10 29% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.7 153% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965589-033.D00G 4x8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 23.6 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 15.5 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MD50-LS0 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MD50-LS0

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	1x

SSD
Virtual HD 54GBMsftBench 55%, 1 sample	1x

RAM
M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A4K40CB1-CRC 47GBSamsungBench 41%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16