HP Desktop M01-F0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 20:11
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 235
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 603
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
HP(103C 8643) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.20.12
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 30.5
18% 23 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 15.8
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 317 300 307 296 284 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 943
Write 331
Mixed 404
SusWrite 326
110% 501 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 38.6
148% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 493
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 493
345% 436 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 121%
Great: 164%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
517GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 114 115 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68% Good
Read 123
Write 103
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 114
66% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68%
Great: 75%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
646GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 69 71 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 81.7
Write 87.7
Mixed 42
SusWrite 71.9
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 101%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
260GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 63 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 55.4
Write 55.5
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 62.1
32% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate Portable 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 118 126 124 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 19.8
Write 65.7
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 122
44% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.2
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 68%
Apple iPod 16GB
1GB free, PID 1263
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 5.4 5.7 5.4 6.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Read 10.4
Write 10.7
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 6.1
12% 9 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$68
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 23.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.6
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F0xxx Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $75
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback