Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A785TD-V EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A785TD-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090708
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 13:28
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 620
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 94.2
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 66
47% 66 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 122
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.8
1% 1.23 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 15 24 18 24 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 51
Write 61
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 22.1
34% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 21%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43
74GB free
Firmware: 3.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 51 51 53 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 53.8
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 52.3
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 30%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
29GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 9.7 11 10 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 12.3
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 9.7
16% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 58%
Mass Storage Device 8GB
5GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 8.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 13.6
13% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 11%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
20GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.5 3.2 3 3 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Read 8.8
Write 0.8
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.9
4% 3.75 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 10%
Generic External 500GB
175GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 20 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 26
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 21
32% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A785TD-V EVO Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785TD-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback