Today's hottest deals

MSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 00:07
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$124
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 164
2-Core 300
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 964
93% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,183
73% 1,183 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 118
Parallax 137
110% 130 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 131
Splatting 108
111% 141 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS300M240C 240GB
96GB free
Firmware: 2200SC6A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 469 472 472 474 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 475
Mixed 422
SusWrite 470
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 47.5
158% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 246
200% 279 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$62
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 838 473 473 480 490 482 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,663
Write 1,860
Mixed 1,540
SusWrite 539
366% 1,651 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 75.4
248% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 734
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 588
439% 591 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 243%
Great: 311%
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
78GB free
Firmware: VC0S0285 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 960 949 478 78 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 2,100
Write 946
Mixed 896
SusWrite 587
250% 1,132 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 52.6
180% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 529
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 601
426% 541 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 198%
Great: 244%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
162GB free
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 144 139 138 141 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 452
Write 389
Mixed 330
SusWrite 162
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 16.6
64% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 32
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 35.7
36% 55.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 56%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
35GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 177 53 42 54 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 510
Write 431
Mixed 427
SusWrite 136
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 29
134% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 45.1
95% 188 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
738GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 170 168 168 168 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 107
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 168
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 36.2
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 37.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 1,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $643
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback