Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 96 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 182 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 380 51% 379 Pts	64-Core 385 24% 385 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470 5,537 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Zotac(19DA 1153) 1.2GB CLim: 656 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Lighting 19.3 Reflection 32.3 Parallax 22.9 16% 24.8 fps	MRender 32.1 Gravity 16.1 Splatting 0.3 11% 16.2 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JAJS300M240C 240GB 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0529A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 167 34 15 109 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 405 Write 257 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 121 44% 202 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 16.2 4K Mixed 0.9 16% 7.13 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 0.9 40% 93 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 111%
Intenso High Speed Line 64GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 59GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 43 58 43 46 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 9,885 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	MC Read 25 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 23.5 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.9 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 54 74% 54 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	48x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	42x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	35x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $280

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16