Today's hottest deals

MSI H410M BOMBER (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M BOMBER (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 16:01
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 247
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 688
71% 570 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB
CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 10.4
7% 9.33 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 9.7
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200619
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 18 21 30 42 5.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 498
Write 390
Mixed 345
SusWrite 52.6
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 11.5
107% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 16.8
71% 155 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST3160316CS 160GB
119GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 92 91 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 91.7
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 90.6
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AU008G-H2666G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 11.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 12.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M BOMBER (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI H410M BOMBER (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback