To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180628
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '22 at 22:44
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 133 58% 93.9 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 216 29% 216 Pts	64-Core 217 13% 217 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2010) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.67% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 1.4 0% 0.9 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 1 Splatting 2 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.67% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Adata SU630 480GB 31,107 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c86 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 39 0.1 20 99 95 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.5% Very poor	Read 99.3 Write 86.5 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 49.8 18% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 3.2 11% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 99%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$90 12,451 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 47GB free Firmware: 2AJ10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 68.3 Write 46.3 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 60.1 41% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 50%
Seagate ST2000VX003-1HH164 2TB 3,366 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2TB free Firmware: CV12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 85 79 93 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 82 Write 88.8 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 84.9 56% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 376 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 7TB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 19 17 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 25 Write 21 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 17.7 29% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 376 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4TB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 25 Write 24 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 19 30% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	48.3% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 16.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.1 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	713x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	279x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	264x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16