Ciara Enterprise 7275

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemCiara Enterprise 7275  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Q270M-C
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1862 x 1048 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '22 at 20:23
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 444
60% 448 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 32.4
20% 28.2 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 24.2
24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc601 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 359 355 360 363 363 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,303
Write 1,005
Mixed 518
SusWrite 377
178% 801 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 39.8
209% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 466
430% 647 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 170%
Great: 191%
Pm9a1 NVMe Samsung 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 36304029 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1710 1670 1517 389 391 389 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 1,813
Write 1726
Mixed 1,572
SusWrite 1011
344% 1,531 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 100
318% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,592
DQ Write 1,081
DQ Mixed 1,266
964% 1,313 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 293%
Great: 339%
Sandisk SD9SB8W512G1122 512GB
414GB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 394 398 397 401 401 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 422
Mixed 379
SusWrite 385
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 54.8
188% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 224
203% 311 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 28.1
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 23.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Enterprise 7275 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Ciara Enterprise 7275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback