Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 8 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 7R32 76 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 65.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 193 68% 122 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 280 38% 281 Pts	64-Core 288 18% 288 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia A10G 36 User benchmarks, average bench 151% Nvidia(10DE 152F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1710 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 511.65 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	177% Outstanding	Lighting 256 Reflection 248 Parallax 290 208% 265 fps	MRender 244 Gravity 234 Splatting 166 171% 215 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 193%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 250GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 233GB free Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 155 155 155 155 155 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	95.5% Outstanding	Read 594 Write 259 Mixed 576 SusWrite 159 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 51.2 168% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 176 141% 201 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 96%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 32GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 136 Write 184 Mixed 142 116% 154 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 7.2 1,350% 7.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x16GB 15,722 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 39.6 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 32 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 95%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 99%

Nuclear submarine

CPU
EPYC 7R32AMDBench 63%, 76 samples	3x

GPU
A10GNvidiaBench 151%, 36 samples	3x

SSD
Amazon EC2 NVMe 250GBNvmeBench 86%, 4 samples	2x
Amazon Elastic B 215GBNvmeBench 45%, 31 samples	1x

RAM
1x16GBUnknownBench 53%, 15,722 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16