Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

18 months ago, 16 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 7R32 76 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 54 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 123 48% 81.9 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 249 26% 210 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 250GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 233GB free Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 158 151 159 140 82 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.5% Good	Read 577 Write 257 Mixed 468 SusWrite 144 80% 362 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 22.6 91% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 235 165% 211 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 96%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 86GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 49 44 44 44 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 50 Write 7 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 39.8 22% 29.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x16GB 15,722 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 39.3 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 4.5 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 95%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 99%

Nuclear submarine

CPU
EPYC 7R32AMDBench 63%, 76 samples	3x

GPU
A10GNvidiaBench 151%, 36 samples	3x

SSD
Amazon EC2 NVMe 250GBNvmeBench 86%, 4 samples	2x
Amazon Elastic B 215GBNvmeBench 45%, 31 samples	1x

RAM
1x16GBUnknownBench 53%, 15,722 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16