Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Huananzhi X99-F8 (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory	59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210115
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 01 '22 at 14:04
Run Duration	356 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 795 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 110 2-Core 214 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 821 73% 615 Pts	64-Core 1869 116% 1869 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% PNY(196E 138E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.65 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.9% Excellent	Lighting 130 Reflection 118 Parallax 136 106% 128 fps	MRender 144 Gravity 104 Splatting 0.3 59% 82.8 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xraydisk 1TB 1TB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 793GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0128A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 9.4 9.6 10 176 198 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 464 Write 371 Mixed 374 SusWrite 100 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 22.7 111% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 47.5 84% 157 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 251%
Seagate ST4000NM0035-1V4107 4TB 1,942 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 77GB free Firmware: TN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 106 106 106 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 201 Write 188 Mixed 97.9 SusWrite 106 109% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.2 266% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 115%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 58GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 142 Write 118 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 71.1 65% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 83%
Seagate ST33000650NS 3TB-$100 3,609 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 150 150 154 151 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 151 Write 146 Mixed 75.6 SusWrite 151 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 196 196 197 190 190 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 206 Write 132 Mixed 78.6 SusWrite 193 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 113%
Seagate ST33000650NS 3TB-$100 3,609 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 153 149 150 151 153 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Read 154 Write 151 Mixed 79.6 SusWrite 150 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 87%
Seagate ST4000NM0035-1V4107 4TB 1,942 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 77GB free Firmware: TN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 102 102 102 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 155 Write 147 Mixed 90.6 SusWrite 101 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.1 255% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 115%
External USB3.0 DISK00 1TB 931GB free, PID 0583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 108 117 111 108 114 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.9% Above average	Read 147 Write 148 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 107 158% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.57 MB/s

External USB3.0 DISK01 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 77GB free, PID 0583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 48 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.9% Poor	Read 134 Write 134 Mixed 73 SusWrite 8.1 108% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 27%
External USB3.0 DISK02 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 39GB free, PID 0583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 54 58 57 53 58 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.2% Average	Read 151 Write 143 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 57.2 121% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.4 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 46%
External USB3.0 DISK03 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 58GB free, PID 0583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 3 71 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.4% Below average	Read 145 Write 147 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 12.4 121% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 31%
External USB3.0 DISK04 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 38GB free, PID 0583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 54 58 56 54 60 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.6% Below average	Read 111 Write 106 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 50 111% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3B1 2x31.5GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	63.9% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 19.8 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 16.8 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-F8 Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 80%

Battleship

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	137x
Xeon E5-2680 v4IntelBench 72%, 1,639 samples	59x
Xeon E5-2680 v3IntelBench 71%, 1,417 samples	32x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	41x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	29x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	23x

SSD
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	26x
512GB 512GBNvmeBench 181%, 2,208 samples	11x
GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GBXPGBench 246%, 21,659 samples	10x

RAM
HNMI8GD4240D0 4x8GBUnknownBench 91%, 126 samples	23x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	23x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $283

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)