Dell OptiPlex 745

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell OptiPlex 745
Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex 745 (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110626
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '22 at 22:12
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44 6,294 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	48% Average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 32.7 2-Core 68 40% 58.1 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 130 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 116 7% 116 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400 5,817 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.09 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	9.06% Terrible	Lighting 11.1 Reflection 12.5 Parallax 9.4 9% 11 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 10 Splatting 12.4 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.06% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 724GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 168 191 186 194 199 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.9% Above average	Read 216 Write 208 Mixed 192 SusWrite 185 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 30.1 97% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 34.5 DQ Write 76.4 DQ Mixed 46.2 38% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 545GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 44 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.6% Below average	Read 91.9 Write 59.7 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 42.8 15% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 24.8 82% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 45 DQ Mixed 37.5 29% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 133%
Seagate ST31000340NS 1TB-$95 7,250 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 474GB free Firmware: SN05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 43 42 43 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 77.2 Write 54.6 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 42.2 39% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.9 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 23.6 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 10 16% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.6 196% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 97%
KINGWIN EZD-2535U3 512GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 226GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.4 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.2% Below average	Read 32.6 Write 25.6 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 9.3 31% 24 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 7.3 515% 7.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 166%
Seagate Desktop 2TB 3,779 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1TB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	7.86% Terrible	Read 30.6 Write 24.3 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 9.3 25% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.86% Great: 19%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 240GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 32.8 Write 25.8 Mixed 28.6 SusWrite 9.4 31% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 7.5 528% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 235%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 93.4 43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OptiPlex 745 Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 745

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	63x
Core2 6300Intel $40Bench 34%, 5,234 samples	27x
Core2 Quad Q6700Intel $44Bench 44%, 6,294 samples	24x

GPU
HD 7470AMDBench 2%, 14,835 samples	15x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	15x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
Premier SP550 120GBAdata $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples	7x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	83x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	30x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16