Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8767
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210113
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '22 at 02:14
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Memory 94.3 1-Core 126 2-Core 250 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 795 79% 644 Pts	64-Core 1,016 63% 1,016 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% HP(103C 87A5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.08 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.8% Above average	Lighting 76.2 Reflection 106 Parallax 74.7 62% 85.8 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 72.2 Splatting 58.5 52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB 12,950 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS4NFXV SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 125 131 138 146 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 604 Write 136 Mixed 226 SusWrite 135 60% 275 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 80.1 4K Mixed 38.2 140% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 185 138% 186 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 192%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 776GB free Firmware: HPH5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 120 120 121 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 138 Write 142 Mixed 77 SusWrite 121 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 112%
Sandisk Extreme 55AE 1TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 856GB free Firmware: 3001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 45%
BUFFALO HD-LDS-A 4TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 3.5TB free, PID 02c3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 34 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 30.3 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 33.6 42% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB 19,029 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	46.5% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 11.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 14.4 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 58.9 68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 52%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	1,298x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	1,017x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	769x

SSD
KIOXIA 512GBKbg40znv512gBench 164%, 11,361 samples	570x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 140%, 9,143 samples	366x
INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBNvmeBench 157%, 2,402 samples	312x

RAM
HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9,246 samples	439x
M378A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 2,680 samples	286x
M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 71%, 9,655 samples	275x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $395