Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 UD  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 02:32
Run Duration339 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 284
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 986
90% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,572
97% 1,572 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 128
Parallax 125
114% 131 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 101
Splatting 96.9
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 829 826 792 719 679 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,186
Write 2,119
Mixed 1,362
SusWrite 788
361% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 73.3
237% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 675
516% 710 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 242%
Great: 346%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
91GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 421 376 352 331 317 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 471
Mixed 378
SusWrite 377
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 51.8
173% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$69
131GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 1551 1500 1209 735 711 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,381
Write 2,036
Mixed 1,662
SusWrite 1,200
407% 1,820 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 72.1
236% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,031
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 729
560% 773 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 277%
Great: 410%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
191GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 252 253 252 251 252 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 357
Mixed 403
SusWrite 272
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 49.2
166% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 234
209% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 118%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
332GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 160 159 159 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 173
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 158
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$85
440GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 97 97 96 93 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Asmt ASMT105x 4TB
373GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 181 180 179 180 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 169
Mixed 86
SusWrite 180
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 29.4
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 45.1
SC Mixed 30.4
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 UD Builds (Compare 12,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 UD - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 141% - Outstanding Total price: $508
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback