Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X7460 19 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPU1, 4 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 42 1-Core 38 2-Core 76.1 31% 52 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 301 27% 226 Pts	64-Core 886 55% 886 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i 8TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2.5TB free Firmware: 1.22 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	93.2% Outstanding	Read 539 Write 363 Mixed 467 101% 456 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 39.2 143% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 66.3 67% 107 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 93%
Marvell Raid VD 256GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: MV.R Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.4% Poor	Read 196 Write 158 Mixed 96.3 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.47 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 2.54 13% 5.92 MB/s	DQ Read 63.3 DQ Write 32.9 DQ Mixed 14.5 20% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M395T5750EZ4-CE66 80CE7FB380CE M395T5750EZ4-CE66 80CE7FB380CE M395T5750EZ4-CE66 80CE7FB380CE M395T5750EZ4-CE66 01987FB302FE KINGSTON 01987FB302FE KINGSTON 01987FB302FE KINGSTON 01987FB302FE KINGSTON 01987FB302FE KINGSTON 0198... 40GB 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.2% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16