Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 20:47
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 192
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 560
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 745
46% 745 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.3% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 132
Parallax 122
94% 123 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 128
Splatting 112
92% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 12 15 14 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
78GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 202 174 170 209 204 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 476
Mixed 398
SusWrite 204
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 49.7
165% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 355
266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
24GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 455
Write 453
Mixed 308
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 37.2
132% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 136
141% 229 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
374GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.4 9.4 9.9 11 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
105GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 103 104 104 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 85.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 104
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 108%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 43 19 20 19 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 135
Write 54.1
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 31.1
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$65
836GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 86 85 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 83%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
315GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.4 9.3 9.9 11 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 82%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 5.1 6.8 7 7.1 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 148
Write 148
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 8.2
73% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 86%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 40 21 19 16 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 159
Write 150
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 31.6
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 87%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
8GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 149
Write 143
Mixed 93.8
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$235
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 44 25 21 17 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 109
Write 118
Mixed 66
SusWrite 32
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
209% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 121%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 111 110 115 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 117
Write 83.9
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 114
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GRK F4-2400C15-8GRB F4-2400C15-8GRK F4-2400C15-8GRB F4-2400C15-8GRB F4-2400C15-8GRK F4-2400C15-8GRB F4-2400C15-8GRK 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
113% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 44.4
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 21.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $910
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback