Today's hottest deals

Asus Z10PE-D16 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 Series
Memory117.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 19:54
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 88
2-Core 171
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 588
54% 450 Pts
64-Core 1,554
96% 1,554 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.4% Very good
Lighting 85.1
Reflection 133
Parallax 95.4
69% 104 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 128
Splatting 112
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 476
Write 454
Mixed 396
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 45.3
152% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 343
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
740GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 451 453 455 454 455 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 443
Mixed 402
SusWrite 433
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 47.4
157% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 345
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
WD My Book 25ED 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 159 161 161 161 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 150
Write 160
Mixed 128
SusWrite 156
204% 149 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.8
264% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 95%
WDC WD10 01FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
20GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 36 36 36 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.3% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 36.6
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 35.2
49% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
86% 1.17 MB/s
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
219GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 32.5
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 0.9
32% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 47%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB
299GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 39.4
Write 40.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 5
41% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 12.4
1,003% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 19
DQ Mixed 10.9
1,065% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 214%
HGST HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
436GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.7% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 40.9
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 2
38% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
MC Read 52.5
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 37.1
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 18.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D16 Series Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback