HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory72GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 72GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory61 GB free of 72.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 03 '22 at 00:17
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 137
56% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 470
43% 362 Pts
64-Core 994
62% 994 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
MSI(1462 3797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 94
Parallax 0.2
0% 31.4 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 83.9
Splatting 0.1
48% 67.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253E2001T 1TB
223GB free
Firmware: T0805A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 145 159 114 120 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 238
Write 167
Mixed 202
SusWrite 107
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 7.5
49% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 45.6
DQ Mixed 6.7
27% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 10 12 7.6 5.2 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Read 6.8
Write 24.6
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 8.6
9% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 112%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
480GB free
Firmware: MKAOA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 50 55 54 60 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 33.3
Write 37.4
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 52.8
26% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 87%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
3GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 6.2 6.1 4.7 5.3 5.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Read 19
Write 7.5
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 5.1
9% 8.57 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4E1 ID:80 2C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 ID:80 AD HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB ID:83 0B NT8GC72B4NB1NJ-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72B4NB1NJ-CG ID:83 0B NT8GC72B4NB1NJ-CG 106GB
1333, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback