Gigabyte GA-Z490 VISION D

Performance Results


Gaming 144% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 154% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	178% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z490 VISION D (all builds)
Memory	72.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '22 at 21:13
Run Duration	588 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900-$276 11,130 User benchmarks, average bench 94% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 67.3 1-Core 141 2-Core 274 85% 160 Pts	4-Core 531 8-Core 947 89% 739 Pts	64-Core 1,582 98% 1,582 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% PNY(196E 12FB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.96 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	178% Outstanding	Lighting 255 Reflection 220 Parallax 255 208% 243 fps	MRender 255 Gravity 223 Splatting 184 176% 220 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100 46,203 User benchmarks, average bench 317% 267GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 675 642 655 645 671 630 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 1,739 Write 1,796 Mixed 1,647 SusWrite 653 328% 1,459 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 66.7 181% 69.3 MB/s	DQ Read 48.6 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 68.4 57% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 189% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 486%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB 13,468 User benchmarks, average bench 437% 765GB free Firmware: 614900WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 1354 980 825 791 815 698 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,944 Write 1,665 Mixed 1,739 SusWrite 910 351% 1,564 MB/s	4K Read 55 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 68.3 236% 82.3 MB/s	DQ Read 61.1 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 89.7 75% 104 MB/s
Poor: 280% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 578%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140 12,308 User benchmarks, average bench 232% 1TB free Firmware: RKT343.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 264 232 215 251 248 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 1,171 Write 959 Mixed 1,383 SusWrite 273 212% 946 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 58.3 200% 72.1 MB/s	DQ Read 44.4 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 70.2 62% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 303%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 931GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 118 118 116 116 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 378 Write 348 Mixed 336 SusWrite 118 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 29.2 4K Mixed 19.5 64% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 33.5 DQ Mixed 21.8 18% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 133%
Usb3.1 NVME&SATA 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 402GB free Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 657 632 643 670 693 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 793 Write 388 Mixed 500 SusWrite 604 128% 571 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 33.2 106% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 32.7 DQ Write 45.1 DQ Mixed 42.9 31% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 129%
Jmicron Generic 500GB 679 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 393GB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 292 278 279 288 292 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 349 Write 330 Mixed 336 SusWrite 285 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 34.4 111% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 39.8 DQ Mixed 42.9 31% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 91%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 500GB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 52GB free Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 247 256 264 260 257 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 195 Write 347 Mixed 230 SusWrite 258 59% 258 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 29.3 95% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 27.1 DQ Write 38.7 DQ Mixed 38 27% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 126%
Toshiba HDWG180 8TB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 4TB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 17 14 21 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	6.53% Terrible	Read 6.2 Write 16.7 Mixed 8.9 SusWrite 16.5 9% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 6.53% Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 598GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 115 115 115 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 128 Write 125 Mixed 104 SusWrite 115 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 76%
Toshiba HDWG180 8TB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 215 220 215 222 215 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 228 Write 198 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 216 126% 174 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 4TB 678 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 715GB free Firmware: 1153 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 83 81 75 55 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 7.2 Write 68.4 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 71.5 31% 42.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.9 213% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 69%
Lacie d2 THB USB3 3TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 620GB free Firmware: 1053 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 117 116 117 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	67% Good	Read 118 Write 93.3 Mixed 70.7 SusWrite 116 73% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 108%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 217 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 177GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 60 61 64 64 65 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 47.2 Write 89.6 Mixed 67.1 SusWrite 63.4 96% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 143% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 2,304 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 719GB free, PID 0210 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 117 119 117 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 116 Write 116 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 118 132% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 49%
LD-CT CT 8GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 6GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 13 Write 5 Mixed 9 SusWrite 7.4 11% 8.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.9 143% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GVK 029E CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 04CD F4-3200C16-16GVK 029E CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 95GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 32767, 16384, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.5% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 17 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 10.7 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z490 VISION D Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 183%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 196%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 VISION D

CPU
Core i9-10900KIntel $449Bench 100%, 107,269 samples	164x
Core i9-10850KIntel $286Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	105x
Core i7-10700KIntel $236Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	100x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	87x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	45x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	37x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	47x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	37x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $160Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	25x
CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 83%, 4,608 samples	22x
CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 91%, 17,500 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,614

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16