Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 20.6 2-Core 37 29% 39.3 Pts	4-Core 75.2 8-Core 87.9 11% 81.6 Pts	64-Core 84.3 5% 84.3 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 04B8) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	0.97% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.03 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.97% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB 10,530 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN09610 SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 382 390 384 385 384 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 388 Write 407 Mixed 389 SusWrite 385 89% 392 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 23.2 77% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 120 91% 122 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 313%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 16GB 233 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 13.2 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	242x
GeForce GT 555MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,170 samples	236x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	67x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	38x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	23x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $280

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16