Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 21:43
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$206
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 68.7
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 966
92% 759 Pts
64-Core 1430
88% 1430 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 13A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 111
Parallax 126
102% 121 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 115
Splatting 104
105% 132 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$56
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 934 862 864 861 863 862 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,458
Write 1,805
Mixed 1,647
SusWrite 874
378% 1,696 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 85.2
282% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,178
DQ Write 1,002
DQ Mixed 1,073
808% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 288%
Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
88GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 326 318 321 322 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 440
Mixed 442
SusWrite 328
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 52.9
175% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 170 172 171 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 156
Mixed 93.9
SusWrite 170
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 100%
General USB Flash Disk 64GB
54GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 7.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 46
23% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.4
92% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 42%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
58GB free, PID 0809
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 58 63 59 63 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 170
Write 53.9
Mixed 146
SusWrite 67.1
135% 109 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 5.1
322% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 27.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 27.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,010
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback