Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '22 at 15:19
Run Duration	407 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 82.4 1-Core 131 2-Core 243 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 766 73% 606 Pts	64-Core 1,013 63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3862 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.77 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 246 Reflection 220 Parallax 280 200% 248 fps	Gravity 242 Splatting 181 183% 211 fps
Poor: 128% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520LE SSD ZP1000GM30012 1TB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 349% 535GB free (System drive) Firmware: STNSC016 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1070 903 897 911 926 929 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 1,586 Write 2,361 Mixed 1879 SusWrite 939 382% 1,691 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 95.2 4K Mixed 60.5 190% 65.6 MB/s	DQ Read 638 DQ Write 364 DQ Mixed 498 371% 500 MB/s
Poor: 158% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 499%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 112GB free Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 408 413 406 414 406 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 421 Mixed 275 SusWrite 412 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 42.2 141% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 233 176% 235 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 119%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB 3,395 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 55GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 77 81 81 80 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 81.9 Write 70 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 77.8 16% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 1 12% 5.07 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 11 DQ Mixed 1.8 3% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 39%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 24GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1434 Write 1,221 Mixed 1,167 284% 1,274 MB/s	4K Read 51.4 4K Write 84.6 4K Mixed 60.3 200% 65.4 MB/s	DQ Read 558 DQ Write 436 DQ Mixed 456 352% 483 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 383GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 113 116 97 106 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 104 Write 114 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 104 72% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.7 241% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 6GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 116 109 103 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 21.4 Write 79 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 82.9 48% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.6 246% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 87%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154 3,810 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 76GB free Firmware: FP1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 142 144 155 158 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 179 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 148 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 350% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 110%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 26GB free, PID 027e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 94 100 98 110 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 93 Write 87.8 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 98.6 102% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 72%
BUFFALO External HDD 8TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 501GB free, PID 02c1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 131 122 126 127 133 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 129 Write 107 Mixed 84.4 SusWrite 128 150% 112 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.6 180% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 72%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 9GB free, PID d001 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 83 87 81 87 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 75.1 Write 79.5 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 83.6 87% 65 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 4133 C19 Series 4x8GB 566 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3133 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 38.3 MC Mixed 36.3 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 28.4 86% 30.2 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,439x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	307x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	282x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	178x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	203x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $800

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $47	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)