Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190307
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '19 at 03:58
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 91.6 1-Core 125 2-Core 229 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 747 70% 583 Pts	64-Core 1,056 65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.5% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 112 Parallax 103 84% 106 fps	MRender 93.9 Gravity 97.6 Splatting 90.2 76% 93.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB 29,096 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 545 474 498 480 502 468 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 1,046 Write 745 Mixed 611 SusWrite 494 162% 724 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 56.8 172% 64.3 MB/s	DQ Read 624 DQ Write 506 DQ Mixed 546 414% 559 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 291%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 39GB free Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 413 397 402 401 409 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 380 Write 191 Mixed 318 SusWrite 407 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 99.9 4K Mixed 49.8 160% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 285 233% 333 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 119%
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4GB free Firmware: JURA0101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 494 Write 278 Mixed 291 78% 354 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 41.6 121% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 94.5 DQ Mixed 200 155% 220 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 163 166 166 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 80.5 Write 88.7 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 163 73% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.6 218% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 41GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 124 126 129 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 148 Write 126 Mixed 85 SusWrite 127 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 114%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154 3,810 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 60GB free Firmware: FP1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 157 183 180 151 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 139 Write 138 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 161 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 248% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 110%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 213GB free, PID 027e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 125 105 110 125 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 115 Write 106 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 121 117% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 75% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 72%
BUFFALO External HDD 8TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1.5TB free, PID 02c1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 116 126 129 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 107 Write 113 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 122 149% 108 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.5 186% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 600 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 103GB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 165 161 157 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 146 Write 138 Mixed 94.5 SusWrite 163 183% 135 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.9 223% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 466GB free, PID d001 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 158 158 158 158 158 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 147 Write 147 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 158 161% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 4133 C19 Series 2x8GB 2,074 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	MC Read 50.9 MC Write 48.7 MC Mixed 43.1 136% 47.6 GB/s	SC Read 30.3 SC Write 45.2 SC Mixed 36.1 106% 37.2 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 151%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,439x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	307x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	282x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $59Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	178x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	203x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $800

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)