Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive367% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 06:57
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$240
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 88.6
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 1,118
98% 834 Pts
64-Core 1,118
69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 276
Reflection 245
Parallax 278
225% 266 fps
MRender 318
Gravity 232
Splatting 168
188% 240 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 190%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1222 1472 1836 1942 1940 1945 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
367% Outstanding
Read 2,190
Write 1,932
Mixed 1,972
SusWrite 1,726
440% 1,955 MB/s
4K Read 76.7
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 105
347% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,680
DQ Write 1,277
DQ Mixed 1,438
1,086% 1,465 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 367%
Great: 435%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB
361GB free
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 123 120 123 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 113
Write 126
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 122
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.5
216% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
87GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 115 116 117 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 119
Write 88.6
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 116
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
151GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 106 106 105 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 131
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 105
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
208GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 210 211 212 212 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 151
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 209
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 117%
Great: 113%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
101GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 93 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 110
Write 81.1
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 91.8
111% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 74%
Fantom External HDD 8TB
181GB free, PID b565
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 76 76 76 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 71.1
Write 104
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 76.2
107% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
190% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB
165GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 98 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 96.4
Write 98.2
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 98.4
119% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 53%
FD Fantom 8TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 118 120 120 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.6% Good
Read 174
Write 158
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 119
170% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB
267GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 135 135 135 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 135
141% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 26.6
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback