Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 17-by0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 17-by0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84CA
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 13:42
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4417U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 39
1-Core 51.4
2-Core 87.3
34% 59.2 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 155
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
HP(103C 84CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3.4
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 6.7
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT24H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 148 158 159 165 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 306
Write 186
Mixed 172
SusWrite 158
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 13.9
47% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 167
136% 194 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 104%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
925GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 96 115 112 116 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67% Good
Read 123
Write 87.4
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 110
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.9
200% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67%
Great: 79%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.9 8.9 8.4 9.5 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 6.2
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 8.6
16% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.8
116% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0660
Typical Laptop 17-by0xxx Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-by0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback