Asus G70AB

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Asus G70AB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G70AB
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140113
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '22 at 13:05
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	HND-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 203 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 539 55% 445 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.8% Above average	Lighting 68.7 Reflection 81.3 Parallax 71.5 56% 73.8 fps	MRender 74.7 Gravity 68.7 Splatting 62.6 56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC100S37256GD 256GB 982 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM06.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 166 24 5.4 35 5.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 460 Write 414 Mixed 238 SusWrite 40.5 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 20 97% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 22.5 DQ Mixed 10.7 26% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 85%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 778GB free Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 381 437 436 434 443 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 406 Mixed 357 SusWrite 403 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 39.8 133% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 290 238% 339 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 261GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 103 102 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 130 Write 124 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 103 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA HDWR160 6TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 4.9 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.7% Below average	Read 163 Write 176 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 5.1 126% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%
WDC WD50 EFRX-68MYMN1 5TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 577GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 3.9 1.7 2.3 2 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 116 Write 123 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 6.1 110% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 130% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 51%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 138 142 142 140 139 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 144 Write 145 Mixed 102 SusWrite 136 178% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 59%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 135 143 141 140 141 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 143 Write 141 Mixed 130 SusWrite 134 187% 137 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.8 218% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4x8GB 1,248 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1605 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.3% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 15.9 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 18.5 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G70AB Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: Asus G70AB

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	5x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	4x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	5x
RBU-SC400S37256G 256GBKingstonBench 77%, 443 samples	5x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	2x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,248 samples	13x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	3x
ASU16D3LU1KFG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 56%, 401 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $579

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16