Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 133 59% 95.7 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 438 38% 325 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1D05 1097) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1368 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.86% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 55.6 Parallax 8.2 4% 23 fps	MRender 8.3 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 8.4 6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB 7,447 User benchmarks, average bench 248% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,542 Write 2,259 Mixed 1,717 483% 2,173 MB/s	4K Read 59.9 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 57.3 202% 63.2 MB/s	DQ Read 711 DQ Write 624 DQ Mixed 408 377% 581 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 316%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB 42,443 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.3% Good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 23.1 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 15.3 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	532x

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	319x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	213x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 7,447 samples	109x
MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 199%, 3,806 samples	70x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	45x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	192x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	63x
CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 70%, 2,090 samples	62x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16