PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series |
Memory | 116.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200611 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 25 '22 at 13:24 |
Run Duration | 205 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
|
71.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
151%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$86
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1195 1196 1179 1147 1123 1104 MB/s
|
273%
Outstanding
|
|||
WDC WD181KRYZ-01AGBB0 18TB
12TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 245 247 244 240 249 MB/s
|
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Corsair Neutron XTi 960GB-$358
648GB free
Firmware: SAFC02.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 400 398 392 394 394 MB/s
|
87.5%
Excellent
|
|||
WDC WD181KRYZ-01AGBB0 18TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 149 146 146 148 143 MB/s
|
23.9%
Poor
|
|||
WD WUH721414ALE6L4 14TB
2TB free
Firmware: LDGNW07G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 134 133 131 134 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G9E2 4x31.8GB
4 of 12 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel 0000%@1stBench 76%, 50 samples | 15x |
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4214R1stBench 70%, 89 samples | 10x |
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41101stBench 62%, 546 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 15x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 14x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $1,305 |