A1867 A1867001

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	A1867 A1867001 (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130416
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '22 at 19:05
Run Duration	381 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.7% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 127 60% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 401 39% 322 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% XFX(1682 3066) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0 Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	5.32% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 7.3 Parallax 5.9 6% 6.63 fps	MRender 6.5 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 6.6 5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.32% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 490GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 50 49 53 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 99.8 Write 108 Mixed 95.1 SusWrite 50.3 66% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 10GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 49 52 49 56 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 57.1 Write 59.6 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 52.5 40% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 68%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 19GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 51 50 53 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 54.8 Write 53.7 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 51 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 63%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 40GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 89 89 89 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 80.8 Write 73.6 Mixed 26 SusWrite 89.4 49% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 63%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60 7,916 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 60GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 19 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 72.1 Write 42.5 Mixed 46 SusWrite 19.8 34% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 42%
Maxtor 6 H500R0 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 8GB free Firmware: HA3D SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 19 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.5% Very poor	Read 46.8 Write 49.7 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 19.8 27% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.1 108% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 37%
Maxtor 6 H500R0 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 10GB free Firmware: HA3D SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 19 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.2% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 40.7 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 19.8 22% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.2 120% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 37%
Maxtor 6 L300R0 300GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 5GB free Firmware: BAH4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 36.3 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 19.8 21% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.3 150% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 37%
WD My Book 1140 3TB 6,710 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 49GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 11 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 24.8 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 11.6 29% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 59%
WD My Book 1TB 10,299 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 34GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 27.8 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 11.8 30% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 22%
WD My Book Essentials 1.5TB 1,072 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 7GB free, PID 1110 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 23.2 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 20.1 31% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 21%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 17GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 86 89 84 85 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 89.9 Write 96.4 Mixed 52.8 SusWrite 87.2 110% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.3 223% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 96%
WD My Passport 25E2 3TB 3,377 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 8GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.6% Terrible	Read 29.1 Write 28.1 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 12.1 31% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	47.6% Average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 16.5 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 12.9 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A1867001 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: A1867 A1867001

CPU
FX-8150 Eight-CoreAMDBench 68%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

A1867 A1867001

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: A1867 A1867001

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)