Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210713
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '22 at 06:22
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 84.6 1-Core 122 2-Core 233 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 742 72% 592 Pts	64-Core 970 60% 970 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 112,731 User benchmarks, average bench 83% Asus(1043 04EC) ≥ 4GB Ram: 6GB, Driver: 22.Q2 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.1% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 114 Parallax 146 84% 121 fps	MRender 90 Gravity 112 Splatting 73.5 74% 91.8 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 487 Write 415 Mixed 27.4 68% 310 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 17.8 67% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 1.2 67% 156 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 35,039 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 668GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 166 153 161 161 164 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	74% Very good	Read 96.7 Write 144 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 161 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Golden Empire CL18-20-20 D4-3600 2x8GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	64.7% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 19.3 66% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 19.2 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	24"	1280 701	GSM5B70 27GL650F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 6,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Core i5-11400Intel $136Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	922x
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	855x
Core i5-11600KIntel $180Bench 99%, 43,966 samples	718x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	933x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	611x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	452x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	295x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	248x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	204x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	302x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	261x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	221x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $554

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16