Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire ME600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire ME600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire ME600
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120906
Uptime5 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 13:48
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 166
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 294
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$40
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 102 124 140 92 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 438
Write 187
Mixed 370
SusWrite 114
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 33.7
106% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 274
208% 276 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
19GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 133 158 148 138 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69% Good
Read 95.2
Write 66.2
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 146
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 28.3
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 28.8
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.5
181% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 90%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
524GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 153 151 149 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 70.7
Write 87.2
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 151
140% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
189% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 70%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
84GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 77 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 105
Write 116
Mixed 102
SusWrite 75.6
135% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
210% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 74%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
418GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 131 134 125 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 157
Write 131
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 128
161% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
5GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 162
Write 137
Mixed 83.5
154% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 69%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
597GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 77 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 139
Write 172
Mixed 128
SusWrite 75.6
174% 129 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.8
206% 3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 70%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
139GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 64 67 61 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 103
Write 140
Mixed 128
SusWrite 63.2
151% 109 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
190% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 73%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
822GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 66 68 63 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 175
Write 146
Mixed 84
SusWrite 64.4
148% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire ME600 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ME600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback