Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateOct 07 '22 at 18:24
Run Duration405 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 777
75% 618 Pts
64-Core 1,001
62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$429
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 213
Parallax 204
187% 215 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 158
Splatting 129
142% 180 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 157%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e2000 1024G 1TB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1633 920 766 677 644 852 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,090
Write 1,837
Mixed 1273
SusWrite 915
290% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 55.2
165% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 855
DQ Write 579
DQ Mixed 772
561% 735 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 184%
Great: 351%
Seagate ST4000VX007 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: MFAOAC50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 159 157 160 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 142
Write 154
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 156
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
14GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 155 154 156 143 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 80.8
Write 123
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 147
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
213% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 90%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
8GB free
Firmware: AX0A3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 53 52 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 68.3
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 53.2
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050M 4TB
27GB free
Firmware: FP1T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 131 133 129 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 158
Write 160
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 131
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
180% 1.23 MB/s
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 11 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 41.1
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 11.9
24% 32 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
309% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 90%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 6.7 6.5 5 6.5 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Seagate USB 4TB
78GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 6.7 6.5 6.7 6.7 7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 6.6 6.6 5.4 6.6 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 8TB
53GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 11 11 11 10 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 51.8
Write 32.3
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 10.3
37% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1
99% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 19%
Seagate USB 4TB
66GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 9.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 65.1
Write 19.4
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 10
32% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 9.6 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 33.1
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 10.4
33% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
146% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.9 3.6 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.23% Terrible
Read 34.9
Write 34.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 3.7
34% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
48% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.23%
Great: 20%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 4TB
77GB free, PID 50a0
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.6 3.6 3.9 3.6 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 51.2
Write 33.4
Mixed 29
SusWrite 3.6
35% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
49% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.9 3.9 4 4.1 4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 50.2
Write 33.7
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 3.9
34% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.6 3.7 4 3.7 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 52.2
Write 31.3
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 3.8
36% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
61% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.3 3.9 4.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 50.7
Write 33.1
Mixed 30
SusWrite 4
35% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
51% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 20%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.9 3.6 4.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 49.9
Write 34
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 3.7
34% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 27.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 26.3
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback