Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220813
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 09:10
Run Duration390 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 165
2-Core 328
101% 191 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 958
95% 773 Pts
64-Core 1203
74% 1203 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$429
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 213
Parallax 206
189% 217 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 156
Splatting 128
140% 179 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 158%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e2000 1024G 1TB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1745 891 777 925 889 934 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1,397
Write 2,448
Mixed 1,558
SusWrite 1,027
364% 1,608 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 262
4K Mixed 87.3
336% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 1,220
DQ Mixed 1,435
1,024% 1,304 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 276%
Great: 351%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 177 175 175 176 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 164
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 176
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
14GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 158 152 151 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 84.6
Write 123
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 155
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
222% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 90%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
8GB free
Firmware: AX0A3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 42 42 46 52 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 99
Write 68.6
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 44.2
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MD04ABA400V 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: FP1T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 88 84 88 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 62.2
Write 84.9
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 86.6
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 92%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 3.7 3 3.7 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.7 3.9 3.7 3.7 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 52.2
Write 37.2
Mixed 41
SusWrite 3.8
25% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
415% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate USB 4TB
78GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 4 3.7 3.7 3.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.7 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 8TB
53GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 35
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 36.3
45% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
90% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Seagate USB 4TB
66GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 49.8
Write 34.2
Mixed 27
SusWrite 3.4
34% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.5 2.7 3.4 3.5 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 51.6
Write 33
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 3.4
33% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
58% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 34.6
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 3.4
31% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 20%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 4TB
77GB free, PID 50a0
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 33.6
Mixed 27
SusWrite 3.4
31% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
160% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 84%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 35
Mixed 27
SusWrite 3.4
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
174% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 50.4
Write 34.2
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 3.4
34% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
168% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 52
Write 32.1
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 3.4
34% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%
Seagate USB 4TB
77GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.61% Terrible
Read 31.4
Write 34.8
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 3.3
33% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.61%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 35
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 27.3
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback