Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350M-DS3H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 00:30
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 215
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 671
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 904
56% 904 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.7% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 65.9
55% 68.2 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 55.5
49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
499GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 74 75 94 123 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 155
Write 153
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 88.5
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 33.8
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 28.4
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback