Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151110
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 14 '15 at 13:53
Run Duration399 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$49
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 138
2-Core 278
94% 208 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 528
71% 529 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 57% Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 63.8
56% 68.4 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 57.4
52% 65.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 503
Write 348
Mixed 351
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 18.6
108% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 36.7
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 10.1
38% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78%
Great: 118%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
45GB free
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 481
Write 187
Mixed 272
69% 313 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 5.89
88% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 7.77
35% 78 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 72%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
621GB free
Firmware: FP1A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 113
Write 111
Mixed 111
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.54
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.27
130% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
341GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 79.4
Write 58.6
Mixed 69.3
52% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.32
82% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 61%
Asmedia ASM1053 640GB
196GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
Read 93.3
Write 73
Mixed 78.3
61% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.29
78% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
68GB free
Firmware: 1AN10003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 108
Write 59.9
Mixed 92.4
66% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.45
102% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
16GB free
Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 71.9
Write 64.9
Mixed 57.5
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.32
90% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
10GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 72.6
Write 75.5
Mixed 100
63% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.18
54% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 73%
Samsung D3 Station 2TB
613GB free, PID 6123
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 114
Write 146
Mixed 128
172% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 8.18
4K Mixed 0.44
295% 3.04 MB/s
DQ Read 0.63
DQ Write 7.83
DQ Mixed 0.75
294% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 80%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00A7B0 500GB
353GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 38.1
Write 40.6
Mixed 32.7
48% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2.58
4K Mixed 0.31
101% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 23%
Innostor Innostor 64GB
11GB free, PID 0903
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 184
Write 42.5
Mixed 48.1
89% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.06
28% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38%
Great: 60%
Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback