Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '15 at 21:49
Run Duration364 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$49
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 553
74% 555 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 64.5
56% 68.7 fps
MRender 74.8
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 58.2
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 485
Write 338
Mixed 348
86% 390 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 18.4
99% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 17.5
23% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 118%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
18GB free
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 472
Write 188
Mixed 273
68% 311 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 3.95
70% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 99.8
DQ Mixed 6.91
21% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 72%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
591GB free
Firmware: FP1A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 112
Write 96.6
Mixed 98.3
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.27
89% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
337GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 73.1
Write 51.1
Mixed 66.3
48% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.25
63% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 61%
Asmedia ASM1053 640GB
111GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.7% Average
Read 60.9
Write 80.6
Mixed 85.8
58% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.36
92% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
33GB free
Firmware: 1AN10003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 78.2
Write 62.7
Mixed 75.4
54% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.25
59% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
16GB free
Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 69.9
Write 67.7
Mixed 70
52% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.39
101% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
10GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 74.8
Write 65.3
Mixed 83.8
57% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.16
44% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 73%
Samsung D3 Station 2TB
602GB free, PID 6123
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 117
Write 126
Mixed 108
152% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 7.71
4K Mixed 0.54
283% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 80%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00A7B0 500GB
458GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 39.9
Mixed 15.9
38% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.38
83% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FADM 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 28.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 26.1
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback