Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571GT
Memory17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 06:44
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 185
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 286
35% 267 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
823GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 111 109 109 86 102 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 547
Write 464
Mixed 343
SusWrite 102
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 5.6
17% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 300%
Colorful SL300 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 62 69 50 67 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.9% Very poor
Read 136
Write 121
Mixed 125
SusWrite 65.3
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 3.3
15% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 68%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
910GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 75 73 81 61 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42% Average
Read 75.7
Write 76.8
Mixed 43
SusWrite 70.4
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42%
Great: 79%
Asmt 2235 128GB
73GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 78 60 70 56 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.2% Good
Read 158
Write 145
Mixed 112
SusWrite 59.3
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 3.5
694% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 63%
Jmicron Tech 256GB
31GB free
Firmware: 0212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 74 75 67 49 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 135
Write 138
Mixed 131
SusWrite 63.3
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 4.7
810% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%
CT240BX5 00SSD1 240GB
97GB free, PID 0563
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 58 79 71 42 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.9% Average
Read 135
Write 137
Mixed 129
SusWrite 64.6
155% 116 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 4
323% 5.03 MB/s
WDC WD10 EZEX-08WN4A0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0563
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 53 75 73 42 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.6% Below average
Read 126
Write 137
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 64.4
130% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.23 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback