Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 12:46
Run Duration516 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,064
95% 803 Pts
64-Core 2,216
137% 2,216 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$530
EVGA(3842 3785) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 248
Reflection 222
Parallax 218
202% 229 fps
MRender 265
Gravity 163
Splatting 133
146% 187 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 167%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T1R0B-68A4Z0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 411000WR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 397 416 422 431 426 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 416
Mixed 330
SusWrite 413
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 40
134% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 204
158% 217 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 119%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1947 1035 1041 1034 992 1026 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,294
Write 2,207
Mixed 1,558
SusWrite 1,179
354% 1,560 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 60.9
190% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 399
402% 676 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 219%
Great: 303%
WDC WD140EDFZ-11A0VA0 14TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 151 155 154 160 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 144
Write 158
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 157
32% 140 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 3.1
19% 6.13 MB/s
DQ Read 5.2
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 2.2
4% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 26%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 212 211 210 211 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 219
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 211
130% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
213% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
949GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 106 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 145
Write 150
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 105
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.7
221% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 122%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 109 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 135
Write 146
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 109
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1
305% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 136%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: LEGNT925
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 233 221 238 233 232 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 215
Mixed 107
SusWrite 230
137% 188 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 2.1
446% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%
WD WD140EMFZ-11 14TB
3TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 100 99 101 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 123
Write 134
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 99.8
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.4
289% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 117%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: LEGNT925
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 136%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 176 181 173 178 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 225
Write 239
Mixed 106
SusWrite 179
137% 187 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1
296% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 116%
Great: 136%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 129 132 130 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68% Good
Read 106
Write 114
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 130
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
305% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HUH721212ALN600 12TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: LEGNT3D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 163 163 169 170 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 149
Write 150
Mixed 84
SusWrite 167
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.7
343% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 91%
Great: 137%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
706GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 90.7
Write 91
Mixed 75
SusWrite 89
118% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38%
Great: 60%
WDC WD40 03FFBX-68MU3N0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 92 93 93 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 231
Write 241
Mixed 128
SusWrite 92.3
224% 173 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 1.6
310% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 102%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 116 117 115 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 114
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 114
139% 101 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
219% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 82%
WDC WD10 0EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 116 117 116 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 145
Write 148
Mixed 112
SusWrite 115
174% 130 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 1.2
275% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 86%
WDC WD10 0EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
806GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
Read 154
Write 169
Mixed 120
SusWrite 16.8
149% 115 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.9
340% 4.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 6.1
DQ Mixed 1.4
257% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
581GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 155
Write 153
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 16.8
127% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.6
268% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 72%
WDC WD60 02FFWX-68TZ4N0 6TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
Read 162
Write 175
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 17.1
137% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
201% 2.3 MB/s
WDC WD60 02FFWX-68TZ4N0 6TB
4.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 53 53 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.1% Above average
Read 198
Write 212
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 52.9
173% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
181% 2.07 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 37.2
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 34.5
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $912
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback