Asus H110M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-E  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 04:49
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 210
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 339
43% 327 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.77 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 275 23 27 22 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 371
Write 404
Mixed 322
SusWrite 115
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 30.8
122% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 169
156% 235 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71%
Great: 102%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
412GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 382 399 401 382 333 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 392
Mixed 344
SusWrite 373
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 46.1
147% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 288
235% 335 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGU881-26N190A 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-E Builds (Compare 288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback