Gigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 168%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 13:46
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 173
2-Core 344
104% 198 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,298
118% 989 Pts
64-Core 2,252
139% 2,252 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 221
Parallax 215
199% 227 fps
MRender 254
Gravity 161
Splatting 132
143% 182 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 164%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE6500GTTD 500GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,028
Write 2,403
Mixed 1,908
473% 2,113 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 79
265% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1286
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 618
582% 917 MB/s
Poor: 148% Great: 391%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3142 3166 3173 3027 3125 3166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
448% Outstanding
Read 2,678
Write 3,229
Mixed 2,964
SusWrite 3,133
680% 3,001 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 98.3
316% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,293
DQ Write 996
DQ Mixed 1,110
839% 1,133 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 448%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGU881-26N190A 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 52.6
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 34.7
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 32.7
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback