Gigabyte GA-Z690 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 215%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220328
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 03 '23 at 21:29
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$204
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 202
2-Core 393
117% 225 Pts
4-Core 750
8-Core 1,313
125% 1,032 Pts
64-Core 1,792
111% 1,792 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 110%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 278
Reflection 260
Parallax 319
226% 286 fps
MRender 322
Gravity 237
Splatting 177
193% 245 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 192%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$94
501GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,990
Write 9,678
Mixed 9722
2,259% 10130 MB/s
4K Read 1,029
4K Write 561
4K Mixed 280
2,215% 623 MB/s
DQ Read 2,215
DQ Write 1,713
DQ Mixed 1,855
1,417% 1,928 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
172GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 484 486 486 486 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 485
Mixed 400
SusWrite 486
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 62
214% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
WDC WD40 EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 94 95 96 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 213
Write 176
Mixed 126
SusWrite 97
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 1.1
30% 9.07 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 11.9
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 33%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 120 120 121 120 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
48% Average
Read 46.9
Write 58
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 119
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.4
127% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48%
Great: 64%
679GB free
Firmware: 010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 21 18 19 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 39
Write 39.7
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 18.7
24% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 106%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
207GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 94 93 90 92 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 63.4
Write 75
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 90.9
48% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 59%
490GB free
Firmware: 010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 21 18 19 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 35.3
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 18.7
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 101%
Samsung STORY Station 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 5f06
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 43 41 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.6% Very poor
Read 50.9
Write 33
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 41.3
52% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
159% Outstanding
MC Read 64.3
MC Write 63.1
MC Mixed 57.5
176% 61.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 51.2
SC Mixed 30.1
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 159%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 GAMING X Builds (Compare 1,909 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback